“When my addiction brought me to the point of complete powerlessness, uselessness, and surrender some 15 years ago (written in 1965) there was no NA. I found AA, and in that fellowship met addicts who had also found that program to be the answer to their problem. However, we knew that many were still going down the road of disillusion, degradation, and death, because they were unable to identify with the alcoholic in AA. Their identification was at the level of apparent symptoms and not at a deeper level of emotions or feelings, where empathy becomes a healing therapy for all addicted people. With several other addicts and some members of AA who had great faith in us and in the program, we formed, in July 1953, what we now know as Narcotics Anonymous”.
Jimmy K.
Founder of Narcotics Anonymous
James Kinnon died July 9, 1985 after spending the last 35 years of his life clean and is recognized as the founding member of NA, although he never recognized himself as that. I believe I read at one time he said all that he ever did was plant some seeds and waited for them to grow. Grow they have.
Did you know:
There are over 750 meetings a week in Tehran, Iran?
That NA started in Hong Kong in 1987?
You could go to the Chosen Frozen Group of NA that meets Tuesday Nights in Anchorage, Alaska?
After visiting the Eiffel Tower you could catch a meeting in Paris, France?
You could attend a meeting in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, Canada on Thursday nights at 8 pm.
Planting a few seeds is all that was done.
There are a lot of folks that write about AA on this site but not many that write about NA. I’m not sure why that is. Our fellowship has a wonderful history and it has grown by leaps and bounds over the last 10 years. I know that NA really didn’t take hold in my area until 1982 or 1983. It had sporadic growth and now seems to have grown 3 fold over the last 5 years.
We have over 80 weekly meetings here in all areas of town.
There are some who would like to compare NA and AA, or put them against one another. There is a strong feeling in my area that there is a division between the two and there is, I’m not going to deny it. I have read about the “Pure Alcoholic” and the “Na Purist” who can’t or won’t see eye to eye. That’s fine, my concern is that help is available to those who want it and where they are comfortable finding it. AA has had great success in helping the alcoholic, because AA is able to focus on one thing, The Alcoholic. Many of us who attend NA simply could not identify with the alcoholic because the term alcoholism is too limited a term.
NA deals with addiction, which is all encompassing to any mind altering or mood changing substance.
I have heard of addicts, who after some time, left NA to attend AA. They thought there was more social acceptability in calling themselves a recovering alcoholic rather than a recovering drug addict or recovering addict. The stigma is still there. I have a few friends who go back and forth between the two fellowships. I’m kind of up in the air about that. I think I would be insulting AA if I went to one of their meetings and identified myself as an alcoholic and tried to share on literature I don’t read, AA Steps I don’t work, AA Service I’m not involved in, AA Sponsorship which I don’t have. It would be insulting and untruthful.
There are several small towns in which NA is not in and AA is. I have talked in detox wards where the questions are presented, “What do I do if there is not NA in my town, only AA? Aren’t they the same”?
If someone is seeking recovery and NA is not in their town the old adage “Any port in a storm may apply”. Most larger towns now have meetings in them, even towns it was once unheard of.
“We don’t have a drug problem in our community” I have read or heard folks say. Until the indicators can no longer be ignored and Public Relations receives calls from courts, hospitals, concerned citizens and even local AA offices inquiring where meetings may be at.
If you or a loved one has a drug problem, maybe we can help.
Information can be found at: www.na.org
Take Care…….Bob D.